Study aid only. Verify against current guidelines before clinical use.

Gray zone lymphoma and aggressive B-cell lymphomas

Malignant Hematology
Gray Zone & Other Aggressive B-cell Entities

WHO 2022 / ICC 2022: Updated Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma Categories

  • DLBCL/HGBL with MYC + BCL2 rearrangements (with or without BCL6; 'double-hit', 'triple-hit'), renamed in WHO 2022 from the WHO 2016 HGBL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements; MYC + BCL6 alone no longer qualifies in WHO 2022. WHO 2022 retains MYC + BCL2 (with or without BCL6) as the highest-risk; ICC 2022 also recognizes MYC + BCL6 as separate.
  • HGBL with 11q aberration, a new WHO 2022 entity. MYC-negative, partial 11q gain/loss; previously called "Burkitt-like with 11q aberration."
  • HGBL NOS: aggressive mature B-cell lymphoma of medium-sized or blastoid cells that fits no other defined entity (not Burkitt, no MYC + BCL2 rearrangement, no 11q aberration); a heterogeneous diagnosis of exclusion. WHO 2022 places MYC + BCL6 cases with this morphology here (ICC 2022 keeps HGBL NOS but separates MYC + BCL6 as provisional).
  • Mediastinal gray-zone lymphoma (MGZL): features intermediate between PMBL and cHL; ICC 2022 term "mediastinal gray zone lymphoma"; WHO 2022 retains it as a separate entity.
  • EBV+ DLBCL NOS: formerly "EBV+ DLBCL of the elderly," now any age; worse prognosis.
  • Large B-cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement: pediatric/young adult, often tonsillar; favorable outcome with R-CHOP-like therapy.
  • T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL): aggressive; treat as DLBCL.
  • Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type: aggressive, MYD88 L265P common; R-CHOP-like.
  • Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL): HHV-8+, often EBV+, body-cavity effusions, HIV-associated; aggressive.
  • Plasmablastic lymphoma: HIV+/EBV+ (oral cavity); aggressive; CD20-negative, MYC+ common.

Gray Zone Lymphoma (Mediastinal, MGZL)

Spectrum bar placing mediastinal gray zone lymphoma between PMBL and classical Hodgkin lymphoma, two rows showing discordant morphology and phenotype, and cards on presentation, markers and treatment.
MGZL sits between PMBL and cHL; discordant morphology and phenotype is the diagnostic clue. Tap to enlarge.
  • Definition: B-cell lymphoma with features intermediate between DLBCL/primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), not clearly assignable to either.
  • Presentation: large anterior mediastinal mass with or without supraclavicular nodes; more common in males aged 20 to 40 years; thymic origin. Cases formerly called non-mediastinal gray zone lymphoma are now classified as DLBCL, NOS or another defined entity; MGZL is restricted to the mediastinal setting (a mediastinal primary may still disseminate).
  • Morphology: large pleomorphic cells in a diffusely fibrous stroma; cells are typically larger and more pleomorphic than in PMBL, sometimes resembling lacunar or Hodgkin-like (Reed-Sternberg-like) cells. Necrosis without a neutrophilic infiltrate is frequent.
  • Immunophenotype: CD45+, PAX5+, BOB.1+, OCT-2+, CD30+, CD79a+, CD15 and CD20 variable (often discordant with morphology, see table); CD10-negative, ALK-negative; BCL6 variable; EBV-negative (EBV positivity excludes MGZL; classify such cases as EBV+ DLBCL). The phenotype is atypical and shows transitional features between PMBL and cHL.
Gray zone lymphoma: morphology vs phenotype
Morphology resemblesPhenotype suggesting gray zone lymphoma
PMBLPrimary mediastinal B-cell lymphomaCD20 dim/negative; CD30+ and CD15+
cHLClassical Hodgkin lymphomaStrong uniform CD20+ and CD15-negative
  • Prognosis: worse than either classical Hodgkin lymphoma or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
  • Treatment: DA-EPOCH-R is generally preferred (Wilson Blood 2014, NCI series); R-CHOP or ABVD are less favored. Consider ISRT for residual, bulky, or localized disease based on response; routine consolidation radiation is not required (the NCI DA-EPOCH-R study omitted planned RT). Treat with R-based therapy if CD20+.

Reduced-Cardiotoxicity Options

  • Anthracycline-free (absolute anthracycline contraindication or very low LVEF): R-CEOP, R-CEPP, R-GCVP.
  • Anthracycline-containing but lower cardiac risk (not for absolute contraindication): liposomal doxorubicin (RCDOP), infusional DA-EPOCH-R.
  • Relevant when a large-cell lymphoma requires anthracycline-based therapy but cardiotoxicity is a concern. Options include:
    • RCDOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone): liposomal doxorubicin has less cardiac toxicity.
    • DA-EPOCH-R: anthracycline is infused over several days, mitigating cardiac risk.
    • RCEPP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, prednisone, procarbazine).
    • RCEOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, prednisone).
    • RGCVP (rituximab, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone).
  • Document baseline ejection fraction (MUGA or TTE). Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity risk rises from ~1 to 2% at cumulative doses of 300 mg/m2 to 6 to 20% at 500 mg/m2; total lifetime dose is generally limited to 450 mg/m2. Baseline LVEF below 50% is very high risk (HFA-ICOS, ESC 2022): cardio-oncology review and favor an anthracycline-free or liposomal regimen.

Double-Hit / Triple-Hit HGBL

Sorter diagram: FISH and IHC findings in newly diagnosed DLBCL mapped to double/triple-hit HGBL, MYC plus BCL6 cases, HGBL with 11q aberration and double-expressor DLBCL, with treatment for each.
Classifying aggressive large B-cell lymphoma by FISH and IHC under WHO 2022 and ICC 2022. Tap to enlarge.
  • FISH for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 should be performed on ALL DLBCL; the Hans algorithm / GCB phenotype alone misses it.
  • Frequency: ~5 to 10% of DLBCL have MYC + BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements.
  • Clinical: aggressive, high LDH, BM/CNS involvement, advanced stage.
  • Treatment: DA-EPOCH-R generally preferred over R-CHOP (Petrich Blood 2014; Howlett Br J Haematol 2015, retrospective benefit; awaiting prospective definitive data). CNS prophylaxis generally considered (double-hit status itself is a high-risk feature, separate from CNS-IPI; benefit unproven). Outcomes worse than DLBCL-NOS.
  • Distinguish from "double-expressor": MYC (≥40%) and BCL2 (≥50%) protein overexpression by IHC, independent of rearrangement status (FISH defines double-hit); not a separate entity, remains DLBCL, NOS, intermediate prognosis, treated as DLBCL.

HGBL with 11q Aberration

  • Formerly called Burkitt-like with 11q.
  • MYC-negative, partial 11q gains and telomeric losses ("dual-pattern").
  • More pleomorphic morphology than classic Burkitt; often nodal.
  • Treated as Burkitt or aggressive B-cell disease: DA-EPOCH-R or CODOX-M/IVAC-R.

EBV+ DLBCL NOS

  • Historically considered elderly; the WHO 2016 revision removed the age restriction, so any age.
  • EBER+ in most tumor cells (ICC 2022 uses a >80% cutoff; WHO-HAEM5 requires EBV in the majority without a fixed threshold).
  • Often non-GCB phenotype; worse prognosis than EBV-negative DLBCL.
  • R-CHOP standard; outcomes inferior; emerging strategies (venetoclax/daratumumab, PD-1 inhibitors).

Plasmablastic Lymphoma

Comparison grid of EBV-positive DLBCL, plasmablastic lymphoma and primary effusion lymphoma by virus, setting, CD20 status, markers, treatment and outlook.
EBV+ DLBCL, plasmablastic lymphoma and PEL: virus, CD20 status and treatment differ. Tap to enlarge.
  • HIV-associated (especially oral cavity) or post-transplant; EBV+ in ~75%.
  • Phenotype: CD20-negative, CD138+, MUM1+, MYC+ in ~50%, Ki-67 high.
  • Aggressive; rituximab adds no benefit (CD20-negative) and CHOP alone is suboptimal, so prefer more intensive therapy such as DA-EPOCH.
  • DA-EPOCH or CODOX-M/IVAC; bortezomib plus chemo (V-EPOCH); CD38-targeted (daratumumab) emerging.

Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL)

  • HHV-8 (KSHV)+, often EBV+, HIV+; serous-cavity effusions (pleural, pericardial, peritoneal) without a solid mass.
  • CD20-negative, CD30+, CD45+, MUM1+; very aggressive (median OS ~6 months).
  • CHOP-based (or DA-EPOCH) therapy with concurrent antiretroviral therapy; IL-6/HHV-8-directed strategies (rituximab less effective because CD20 is absent).

High-Yield Pearls

  • Always FISH MYC, BCL2, BCL6 in newly diagnosed DLBCL to identify double-/triple-hit HGBL.
  • HGBL with 11q = new WHO 2022 entity, MYC-negative, treat like Burkitt.
  • DA-EPOCH-R preferred for double-hit HGBL, MGZL, and primary mediastinal lymphoma; for CD20-negative plasmablastic lymphoma use DA-EPOCH without rituximab.
  • MGZL: between cHL and PMBL; young males with anterior mediastinal mass; CD30+, variable CD15/CD20; prognosis worse than either parent entity.
  • Plasmablastic: CD20-negative, so rituximab is ineffective; HIV/oral-cavity association.
  • PEL: HHV-8+ body-cavity effusions typically without a mass (extracavitary PEL can form tissue masses), very aggressive.
  • Double-expressor (IHC) is not the same as double-hit (FISH); distinct entities, different prognoses.
Veli Bakalov MD, Board Review Notes 2026

Practice guidelines

Official guidelines on each society's website (opens in a new tab). NCCN may ask for a free login.