Study aid only. Verify against current guidelines before clinical use.

Breast Cancer (Part 1): Risk, Genetics, Screening, Diagnosis and Staging

Medical Oncology·Breast Cancer·2026
Breast Cancer (Part 1): Risk, Genetics, Screening, Diagnosis and Staging

Overview

  • Epidemiology (US, 2025): ~310,000 new invasive cases + ~57,000 DCIS; ~42,000 deaths. Worldwide ~2.3M new cases in 2020, rising in economically developed regions (screening, reproductive factors, fat intake, BMI, age at menarche/lactation).
  • Trends: incidence ↑ ~1%/yr, steeper (~1.4%/yr) in women <50 (↑ obesity, ↑ childbearing age); death rate ↓ ~1%/yr (better tx and detection).
  • Most common non-skin ca in women; worldwide the most common cause of ca death in women, #2 cancer death in US women (after lung).
  • Lifetime risk ~13% (1 in 8 women).
  • 5-yr relative survival (AJCC stage): stage 0 ~99%, stage I ~99%, stage II ~93%, stage III ~72 to 75%, stage IV ~22 to 30%.
  • Male breast cancer: <1% of breast ca; dx ~60 yrs; mostly HR+, often associated with BRCA2 or PALB2, Klinefelter, testosterone deficiency, or high estrogen-to-testosterone states (obesity, cirrhosis).

Risk factors

Age, sex, race
  • Age and female sex are the most important risk factors.
  • Incidence White > Black (↑ postmenopausal HRT use and ↑ screening). Mortality ~40% higher in Black women, who are more likely dx <40 yrs, at more advanced stage, with high-grade or triple-negative tumors.
  • Incidence and mortality lower in Asian, Native American, and Hispanic populations.
Behavioral / modifiable
  • Alcohol: 1 drink/day associated with ~12% ↑ risk (dose-dependent).
  • Obesity (BMI >30): ↑ risk in postmenopausal women.
  • Smoking and low physical activity: modest ↑.
  • Isoflavones (soy phytoestrogens), dairy, high-fat diets: unclear evidence.
Reproductive / endogenous hormones
  • Early menarche (<12), late menopause (>55), nulliparity, late age at first pregnancy (>30) = extended estrogen exposure → ↑ risk for HR+ disease.
  • Lactation and full-term pregnancy (terminal differentiation of breast epithelium) are protective.
  • OCPs (both estrogen/progestin and progestin-only) ↑ risk, but absolute risk is very small.
  • TNBC is associated with ↑ number of births and is NOT associated with nulliparity (opposite pattern to HR+).
Exogenous hormones (WHI)
  • Combined estrogen + progestin → ↑ breast ca (HR ~1.26), especially HR+ and in >50 yrs; excess risk declines after d/c but persists for years (WHI 20-yr follow-up: CEE+MPA breast ca incidence HR 1.28). After the 2002 WHI report, US menopausal hormone use fell sharply; invasive breast ca incidence dropped 6.7% (2002 to 2003), 8.6% comparing 2001 with 2004, mainly in women ≥50 and ER+ tumors.
  • Estrogen alone (post-hysterectomy): does NOT ↑ breast ca; may ↓.
Radiation exposure
  • Thoracic RT at ages 10 to 30 (e.g., mantle RT for Hodgkin) → annual mammogram + annual breast MRI starting 8 yrs after RT but not before age 25 (whichever is later).
Mammographic density
  • Proportion of radiopaque (epithelial/stromal) vs radiolucent (fat) tissue. Categories: A (almost entirely fatty), B (scattered fibroglandular), C (heterogeneously dense, may obscure masses), D (extremely dense, lowers mammography sensitivity). C or D = dense.
  • Exogenous hormones (HRT, OCP) ↑ density.
  • DBT and contrast-enhanced mammography ↑ sensitivity in dense breasts. Supplemental modalities (whole-breast US, contrast-enhanced mammo, breast MRI, abbreviated MRI, molecular breast imaging) ↑ detection, but effect on outcomes is unknown; insurance coverage variable.
  • Dense breast notification: federal mandate (effective Sep 10, 2024): mammography facilities must notify patients of breast density with standardized language (dense tissue ↓ mammographic sensitivity and ↑ risk; patient advised to discuss with their provider whether other imaging may help); supplemental imaging is not mandated.
Familial risk
  • 5% to 10% associated with highly penetrant mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2). 15% to 20% associated with low-penetrance genes/SNPs and FHx.
  • 1st-degree relative with breast ca → ~x2 risk. 1st-degree relative dx <50 or two 1st-degree relatives → ~x3 to x4 risk.

Genetic risk factors

  • Proband: the affected individual through whom a family is first identified for genetic evaluation (index case); not necessarily the first relative tested.
  • High-penetrance (RR >5) identifiable by pedigree; moderate-penetrance (RR 2 to 5) harder to identify (incomplete penetrance).
  • Ashkenazi Jewish: ~2.5% carry 1 of 3 founder mutations (2 in BRCA1, 1 in BRCA2); these account for ~12% of breast ca and ~35% of ovarian ca in this population.
  • BRCA1/2 are the main genes with treatment implications in breast ca (PARP inhibitors; olaparib also active in germline PALB2, TBCRC 048 ORR 82%).
  • TP53 (Li-Fraumeni): ~90% lifetime malignancy risk, very-early-onset breast ca; ↑ risk of ca in RT field (avoid RT when possible); HER2+ more common.
  • PTEN (Cowden): AD; breast with thyroid, endometrial, colon, renal; autism, macrocephaly, hamartomas, trichilemmomas.
  • CDH1 (HDGC): diffuse gastric ca + invasive lobular breast ca; prophylactic total gastrectomy, usually ages 20 to 30 (individualized); endoscopic surveillance if deferred.
  • PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2): loss-of-function ↑↑ with FHx; breast risk near BRCA2 (mammo + MRI at 30, discuss RRM), but ovarian risk low (consider RRSO >45).
  • RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1: RAD51C/D give ovarian ca and moderate breast ca risk (~20%, esp ER-/TNBC); BRIP1 gives ovarian ca with no established breast risk.
  • BARD1 → TNBC. ATM and PALB2 → pancreatic ca. CHEK2 → ↑ breast ca (colorectal association modest, not established; average-risk CRC screening).
  • ASCO-SSO 2024: offer BRCA1/2 testing to all newly diagnosed patients ≤65 yrs (and selected >65, e.g., PARP inhibitor candidates, TNBC); universal multigene panel testing regardless of family history is NOT yet standard of care.
BRCA1 vs BRCA2 pathogenic variants: cancer risks
Risk factorBRCA1 PVBRCA2 PV
Breast ca risk to age 7055% to 70%45% to 70%
Ovarian ca, lifetime risk39% to 58%13% to 29%
Contralateral breast caRR 4.5RR 3.4
Absolute risk after 10 yrs, women >5010.8%
Absolute risk after 10 yrs, women <3028.2%
Male breast ca before age 807%
Triple-negative likelihoodHighLower
Pancreatic ca↑Higher for BRCA2
Prostate ca↑ for BRCA2
Hereditary breast cancer genes: penetrance and management
Gene (syndrome)Breast ca risk and screeningOvarian ca; other ca and management
BRCA1

>60% (male 0.2% to 1.2%).

Clinical exam q6 to 12 mo at 25; annual MRI at 25, add mammo at 30; individualize >75. Discuss RRM.

Male: annual clinical exam at 35, annual mammo at 50.

Ovarian: 39% to 58%. RRSO at 35 to 40 or on completion of childbearing.

Other: pancreatic ≤5%; prostate 7% to 26% (consider screening).

BRCA2

>60% (male 2% to 7% by 70). Same screening as BRCA1.

Ovarian: 13% to 29%. Onset ~8 to 10 yrs later than BRCA1; can delay RRSO to 40 to 45.

Other: pancreatic 5% to 10%; prostate 19% to 61%; melanoma.

CDH1

HDGC

40% to 60% (lobular). Mammo ± MRI at 30. Discuss RRM.

Other: hereditary diffuse gastric ca; prophylactic total gastrectomy at ~20 ± EGD surveillance.

CHEK2

1100delC

20% to 40%. Mammo at 40 ± MRI at 30 to 35. Manage by FHx, consider RRM.

Other: no established ↑ colorectal ca for CHEK2 alone; average-risk CRC screening unless personal/family history dictates otherwise.

MLH1, MSH2, MSH6,

PMS2, EPCAM

Lynch

<15%; limited evidence for screening/​management.

Ovarian: MLH1 4% to 20%; MSH2/EPCAM 8% to 38%; MSH6 ≤1% to 13%; PMS2 1% to 5%.

CRC: MLH1/MSH2/EPCAM colonoscopy at 20 to 25, q1 to 2 yrs; MSH6/PMS2 at 30 to 35, q1 to 3 yrs (earlier per family hx).

Endometrial/​ovarian: discuss TAH/BSO after childbearing.

PALB2

40% to 60%. Mammo + MRI at 30. Discuss RRM.

Ovarian: 3% to 5%. Consider RRSO if >45.

Other: pancreatic 5% to 10%; screen P/LP variants with +FHx.

PTEN

Cowden

40% to 60% (lifetime). High-risk breast screening.

Other: hamartomas, endometrial, thyroid, macrocephaly, trichilemmomas (pathognomonic). Annual skin/pelvic exam, thyroid US.

STK11

Peutz-Jeghers

30% to 50%. Mammo and MRI at 30.

Ovarian: non-epithelial ~10%.

Other: pancreatic ~15%; GI hamartomas, mucocutaneous pigmentation.

TP53

Li-Fraumeni

~60% (avg dx age 33). Clinical exam q6 to 12 mo at 20; annual MRI at 20, add mammo at 30.

Other: overall >70% male, >90% female: CNS (19%), sarcoma (5% to 22%), ACC (13%), leukemia/​lymphoma. Annual brain + whole-body MRI; avoid RT.

ATM

20% to 40%. Mammo at 40 ± MRI at 30 to 35. Manage by FHx, consider RRM.

Ovarian: 2% to 3%. RRSO uncertain.

Other: pancreatic ~5% to 10%; emerging prostate association.

BARD1

20% to 40% (TNBC). Mammo ± MRI at 40.

Ovarian: no association.

Other: insufficient evidence.

RAD51C, RAD51D

20% to 40%. Mammo ± MRI at 40.

Ovarian: 10% to 20%. RRSO at 45 to 50.

BRIP1

Limited data.

Ovarian: 5% to 15%. RRSO at 45 to 50.

CDKN2A

Not established.

Other: pancreatic >15%; melanoma 28% to 76%.

NF1

20% to 40%. Mammo at 30 ± MRI at 30 to 50. Manage by FHx.

Other: peripheral nerve sheath tumors, GIST.

Screening ages are start ages.
Other hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes
SyndromeGene(s)Associated tumors / features
BAP1 cancerBAP1Uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, RCC
Birt-Hogg-DubeFLCNChromophobe RCC, fibrofolliculoma, spontaneous PTX
Carney complexPRKAR1AAdrenal, thyroid, GCT, schwannoma, pituitary adenoma
DICER1DICER1Pleuropulmonary blastoma, pulmonary cysts, thyroid, ovarian tumors
FAMMMCDKN2A (p16)Early-onset melanoma, ↑ pancreatic in some families
Familial MTCRETMTC, no pheo or parathyroid involvement
Hereditary GISTKIT, PDGFRAMulticentric/​large GIST; mastocytosis (urticaria pigmentosa)

Hereditary paraganglioma /

pheochromocytoma

SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, TMEM127, MAXParaganglioma, pheochromocytoma, RCC
Hereditary papillary RCCMETMultiple bilateral papillary renal tumors

Hereditary leiomyomatosis

and RCC

FH (fumarate hydratase)Skin leiomyomata, uterine fibroids/​leiomyosarcoma, FH-deficient RCC (formerly called type 2 papillary)
Juvenile polyposisSMAD4/DPC4, BMPR1AColon hamartomas with ↑ colon ca risk
MEN type 1MEN1 (ch11)Anterior pituitary, parathyroid, adrenal cortex, pancreatic islet tumors
MEN type 2RETMTC (~95% risk, prophylactic thyroidectomy), pheo, hyperparathyroidism. MEN2b: mucosal neuromas, marfanoid, ganglioneuroma, megacolon
NF type 1NF1 (17q11.2)Neurofibrosarcoma (MPNST), pheo, optic glioma, GIST, breast ca
NF type 2NF2 (ch22)Bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningioma, ependymoma
Nevoid BCC (Gorlin)PTCH1, SUFUMedulloblastoma, basal cell carcinoma
Peutz-JeghersSTK11Mucocutaneous macules, GI hamartomas; ↑ colon, breast, ovarian, small bowel, pancreas ca
Rhabdoid predispositionSMARCB1, SMARCA4Rhabdoid tumors, choroid plexus ca, central PNET
Telomere biology disorderTERTDysplastic nails, chest/neck pigmentation, oral leukoplakia, marrow failure
Tuberous sclerosisTSC1/TSC2RCC, SEGA, hamartoma, cardiac rhabdomyoma
WernerWRN/RECQL2Premature aging, bilateral cataracts, DM, osteoporosis, melanoma/sarcoma

Risk determination models

  • Modified Gail model: most widely used; incorporates current age, age at menarche and first full-term pregnancy/nulliparity, number of biopsies and atypical hyperplasia, number of 1st-degree relatives, race. Good on a population basis but not robust for individuals; underestimates risk with strong genetic predisposition, and does NOT account for breast density or LCIS. Prevention strategies used if 5-yr risk >1.67%.
  • Claus model: includes 1st- and 2nd-degree relatives with breast/ovarian ca and age at diagnosis.
  • Tyrer-Cuzick (IBIS): comprehensive family history + BRCA + breast density. Preferred for high-risk assessment.
  • BRCAPRO and BOADICEA: estimate probability of carrying a genetic mutation.
  • NCCN criteria for genetic testing: refer if dx ≤50, TNBC at any age, male breast ca, ≥2 primaries, Ashkenazi ancestry, strong family history.

Prevention

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO)
  • BRCA1 at 35 to 40, BRCA2 at 40 to 45 (onset ~8 to 10 yrs later), on completion of childbearing. Bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is an alternative but not SOC.
  • Effects: ↓ ovarian ca ~85% (HR 0.14) and ovarian-specific mortality (HR 0.21); uncertain effect on first breast ca (older estimates BRCA1 HR 0.63, BRCA2 HR 0.36, Domchek 2010, likely biased; not confirmed prospectively, especially BRCA1); ↓ breast-specific mortality 55% (HR 0.44); ↓ all-cause mortality 60% (HR 0.40).
  • Short-term menopausal hormone tx until ~age 50 if concern for early-menopause effects.
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM)
  • ↓ breast ca risk >90% in hereditary breast/ovarian ca syndromes (BRCA1/2), mortality benefit not proven in RCTs, but observational data suggest reduced mortality, especially in BRCA1 carriers. Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy are reasonable alternatives.
Chemoprevention (5-yr Gail risk ≥1.67%, or LCIS / atypical hyperplasia)
  • SERMs ↓ invasive breast ca and ↓ fractures, but no effect on breast-specific or all-cause mortality.
  • Tamoxifen x5 yrs (pre or postmenopausal): NSABP P-1, ↓ invasive breast ca ~50%. Adverse: ↑ endometrial ca (RR 3.28), ↑ VTE (DVT RR 1.44, PE RR 2.15; nonsignificant ↑ ischemic stroke (P-1); listed as a serious risk on label), cataracts, vasomotor symptoms, bone loss in premenopausal but ↓ osteoporotic fractures ~29% in women ≥50.
  • Low-dose tamoxifen 5 mg/d x 3 yrs (TAM-01): 50% ↓ recurrence in ADH, LCIS, or DCIS with favorable toxicity.
  • Raloxifene x5 yrs (postmenopausal only): ↓ ER+ invasive ca; inferior to tamoxifen (NSABP P-2 STAR) but ↓ endometrial ca and ↓ DVT/PE. Approved for prevention only (not treatment).
  • Exemestane (postmenopausal): NCIC CTG MAP.3, ↓ invasive ca ~65% (~73% in ER+).
  • Anastrozole (postmenopausal): IBIS-II, ↓ HR+ invasive ca and DCIS >50%.
  • AIs have no endometrial ca or VTE risk but ↑↑ musculoskeletal symptoms and ↓↓ bone density.
  • SERM meta-analysis (83,399 pts): 10-yr breast ca incidence 4.2% vs 6.3% (SERM vs placebo); no effect on ER-negative breast ca or overall mortality.
  • After a breast ca dx, tamoxifen ↓ contralateral breast ca 42% (BRCA1) and 52% (BRCA2).
Lifestyle
  • Moderate exercise (2 to 3 h/wk) ↓ recurrence and all-cause mortality by ~40% to 67%. Low-fat diet: nonsignificant ~9% ↓ invasive breast ca (WHI DM, HR 0.91, CI 0.83 to 1.01); reduced breast ca mortality on long-term follow-up.

Screening

Average-risk (guidelines)
  • USPSTF 2024: biennial mammography ages 40 to 74 (B recommendation; updated from starting at 50 in 2016).
  • ACS (2015): annual 45 to 54, then biennial or annual ≥55 as long as life expectancy ≥10 yrs; option to start annual at 40.
  • NCCN, ASCO, ACR: annual mammography starting at age 40.
  • Meta-analyses: ~22% ↓ breast ca mortality (ages 39 to 74); others 31% to 49% (ages 40 to 75). Annual mammography beginning at age 40 prevents the most breast ca deaths. Harms: false-positive anxiety, unnecessary biopsies, overdiagnosis, ↑ DCIS detection.
  • DBT: ↑ sensitivity and ↓ recall; dose comparable to 2D with synthetic reconstruction, roughly doubled if combined with separately acquired 2D. Breast self-exam and clinical breast exam are of no proven mortality benefit.
High-risk (annual MRI + mammogram)
  • MRI ↑ sensitivity to ~100% added to mammo, but combined imaging has lower specificity. MRI is not routine population screening but is risk-dependent: consider for dense breasts (ACR), and for LCIS/ADH or a personal history when lifetime risk is at least 20%.
  • Indications: BRCA1/2 and other mutations (CHEK2, PALB2, CDH1, ATM, NF1, BARD1, Li-Fraumeni, Cowden); untested 1st-degree relative of a BRCA carrier; lifetime risk ≥20% (BRCAPRO or FHx-based models); chest RT at ages 10 to 30 (begin 8 yrs after RT, not before age 25).
  • General rules: use gene-specific start ages (e.g., BRCA1/2 MRI at 25 with clinical exam q6 mo, mammo at 30; TP53 MRI at 20; ATM/CHEK2 MRI 30 to 35, mammo 40) (or earlier if breast ca dx <25). For an untested relative, start 10 yrs before the youngest family dx (but not later than 40).
Screening vs diagnostic mammogram; BI-RADS
  • Screening (asymptomatic): CC and MLO views bilaterally ± tomosynthesis. Diagnostic (symptoms/abnormal exam/lesion): adds spot compression views.
  • BI-RADS: 0 = incomplete (repeat imaging); 1 = negative (annual); 2 = benign (annual); 3 = probably benign, <2% malignancy (short-interval follow-up); 4 = suspicious, biopsy (4A ~5% to 4C ~95%); 5 = >95% malignancy, biopsy now; 6 = biopsy-proven malignancy.
  • BI-RADS 4 and 5 (>2% malignancy) need biopsy; 6 = already biopsy-proven.

Diagnosis and prognostic indicators

  • Palpable mass: US if <30 yrs, diagnostic mammography if >30 yrs. FNA acceptable for palpable axillary nodes or simple cysts; core needle superior to FNA for a breast mass (place radiopaque clip as locator).
  • MRI: more sensitive, finds ~16% additional ipsilateral disease; ~8% convert BCT to mastectomy; ~11% need additional surgery after wide excision; inaccurate for noninvasive tumor size; contralateral MRI finds occult ca in ~3% (↑ biopsies and contralateral mastectomies without proven survival benefit).
  • Nodes: macrometastasis >2 mm; micrometastasis >0.2 mm or >200 cells but none >2 mm; isolated tumor cells ≤0.2 mm or <200 cells (node-negative). Intramammary nodes count as axillary.
  • LVI: ↓ prognosis, ↑ ipsilateral recurrence; does not preclude BCT but factors into RT.
  • Tumor size: size of invasive component; DCIS size does not affect systemic risk (affects ipsilateral recurrence). Multifocal (≥2 foci in 1 quadrant) or multicentric (≥2 foci in separate quadrants) ↑ nodal positivity and ipsilateral recurrence; stage by largest focus (do not add sizes; use (m) modifier).

Pathology and biomarkers

Histology
  • Invasive ductal (IDC, no special type): ~75% to 80%.
  • Invasive lobular (ILC): ~10% to 15%. E-cadherin negative; vs IDC has ↑ age, ↑ size, ↑ multifocality, ↑ bilaterality, ↑ late recurrence, ↑ ER+, CDH1 inactivation, and ↓ HER2+, ↓ grade; harder to detect on mammo; mets to serosa, ovary, meninges, GI tract.
  • Favorable variants: tubular and mucinous. Adenoid cystic: TNBC with MYB, indolent, no adjuvant chemo. Metaplastic: epithelial + mesenchymal, poor prognosis.
  • Inflammatory breast ca (IBC): clinical dx (peau d'orange, erythema, edema); dermal lymphatic invasion. T4d. Trimodality mandatory.
Receptor status
  • ER/PR (IHC): positive if ≥1% nuclear staining (ASCO/CAP). IHC measures ER-alpha (ESR1); PR is a marker of ER-alpha signaling. ER+ PR- is still HR+ and gets endocrine tx. HR+ associated with older age, lower grade, node-negative, ↑ DFS/OS; ~50% of HR+ recurrences occur in the first 5 yrs, with late recurrence up to 20 yrs. ~25% HR-; ~15% TNBC (highest recurrence in first 5 yrs).
  • HER2 (IHC + ISH): EGFR family (EGFR-1, HER2, HER3, HER4); ~20% of breast ca; ↑ proliferation, higher grade, node+.
    • IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-negative = HER2-low; IHC 0 = HER2-zero (null or ultralow).
    • IHC 2+ = equivocal, reflex to ISH; if amplified, HER2-positive.
    • IHC 3+ or ISH-amplified = HER2-positive.
    • HER2-ultralow: IHC 0 with faint, incomplete membrane staining in ≤10% of cells. T-DXd eligible only if HR-positive metastatic disease that progressed on at least one endocrine therapy (DESTINY-Breast06).
  • Ki-67: proliferation marker; ≥20% considered high (cutoffs vary; MIB-1 Dako Omnis used in monarchE). Higher Ki-67 = more chemosensitive.
Intrinsic molecular subtypes (mostly research)
  • Luminal A (high ER/PR, low Ki-67, grade 1 to 2): best prognosis, endocrine-driven, chemo-insensitive.
  • Luminal B (lower ER/PR, high Ki-67, grade 2 to 3): more aggressive, chemo-sensitive.
  • HER2-enriched: HER2+, HR+ or HR-, high proliferation, grade 2 to 3.
  • Basal-like / TNBC (ER/PR/HER2 negative): high proliferation, grade 3; basal markers CK5/6, EGFR.

Initial evaluation and workup

  • Asymptomatic stage I to II: no systemic imaging needed.
  • Stage III / locally advanced (T0 to 2 N2, T3 N1 to 2, any T4, or any N3): CT chest/abdomen ± pelvis + bone scan. Stage II to III: PET can evaluate regional nodes and distant sites at once, with fewer false positives than CT + bone scan (allows earlier neoadjuvant start).
  • Genetic counseling for FHx; germline testing per ASCO-SSO 2024 (BRCA1/2 for all newly diagnosed ≤65 yrs; selected >65) and NCCN criteria. Nonhormonal contraception; refer to gynecology.
  • Fertility preservation: oocyte, sperm, embryo cryopreservation. GnRH agonist (goserelin) starting ~1 week before chemo (POEMS, in HR- disease) ↑ successful pregnancy and ↓ premature ovarian failure, but is not a substitute for established fertility preservation. Chemo can be delayed up to ~6 weeks. Embryo fertilization needs a partner/donor.

Staging (AJCC 8th ed, anatomic + prognostic)

  • Tis: DCIS or Paget of nipple without invasive ca/DCIS. LCIS removed from staging (benign entity).
  • T1 ≤20 mm (T1mi ≤1 mm; T1a >1 to 5 mm; T1b >5 to 10 mm; T1c >10 to 20 mm). T2 >20 to 50 mm. T3 >50 mm. T4: T4a chest wall (not pectoralis alone), T4b skin ulceration/satellite nodules/edema (peau d'orange), T4c both, T4d inflammatory.
  • Invasion of dermis alone does not qualify as T4. IBC requires typical skin changes over ≥1/3 of the breast (dermal lymphatic invasion is supportive, not required or sufficient alone).
  • M: M0 vs M1.
  • Prognostic stage groups incorporate grade, ER, PR, HER2, and multigene assays; e.g., a T2N0M0 (anatomic IIA) ER+/HER2- tumor with Oncotype RS <11 is downstaged to prognostic Stage IA. Presence of ca in vessels, lymphatics, or nodes precludes classification as a pathologic complete response.
Breast cancer: clinical and pathologic N staging
NClinical (cN)Pathologic (pN)
N0

cN0: no regional node mets (imaging/exam)

pN0: no mets or isolated tumor cells only

  • pN0(i+): malignant cells ≤0.2 mm (H&E or IHC, incl ITCs)
  • pN0(mol+): RT-PCR positive, no histology/IHC
N1

cN1 (movable): ipsilateral level I to II axillary, movable

  • cN1mi: micromets (~200 cells, >0.2 to 2.0 mm)

pN1: 1 to 3 axillary nodes and/or internal mammary micro/macromets by SLNB

  • pN1a: 1 to 3 nodes, ≥1 >2.0 mm
  • pN1b: internal mammary SLN (excl ITCs)
  • pN1c: pN1a + pN1b
N2

cN2: fixed/matted, or internal mammary with negative axilla

  • cN2a: fixed/matted level I to II
  • cN2b: internal mammary only, no clinical axillary

pN2

  • pN2a: 4 to 9 axillary (≥1 >2.0 mm)
  • pN2b: internal mammary detected clinically, negative axilla
N3

cN3

  • cN3a: infraclavicular
  • cN3b: internal mammary + axillary
  • cN3c: supraclavicular

pN3

  • pN3a: ≥10 axillary (≥1 >2.0 mm) or infraclavicular
  • pN3b: clinically detected internal mammary with ≥1 positive axillary node, OR >3 axillary nodes plus clinically occult IM by SLNB (1 to 3 axillary plus occult IM by SLNB is pN1c)
  • pN3c: supraclavicular

Gene expression signatures

MammaPrint (70-gene)
  • Classifies tumors as high or low genomic risk. MINDACT enrolled up to 3 node+ (~80% N0, ~20% N1); assessed both clinical risk (Adjuvant! Online: T stage, N, grade) and genomic risk (MammaPrint).
  • Identifies a subset with low likelihood of distant recurrence despite high-risk clinical features. Low/low: no chemo. High/high: chemo. High clinical/low genomic: slight benefit from chemo. Low clinical/high genomic: no benefit from chemo.
  • Use MammaPrint only in clinically high-risk patients.
MammaPrint (MINDACT): chemo vs no chemo by risk group
Patient risk5-yr OS without distant mets (chemo vs no chemo)DeltaAdjusted HR (chemo vs none)
High clinical / low genomicAll95.9% vs 94.4%1.5%0.78 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.21)
N095.7% vs 93.2%2.5%
N196.3% vs 95.6%0.7%
Low clinical / high genomic95.8% vs 95.0%0.8%1.17 (95% CI 0.59 to 2.28)
Oncotype DX (21-gene Recurrence Score)
  • Defines recurrence risk in ER+ breast ca treated with tamoxifen x5 yrs. Classic categories: low (RS <18), intermediate (RS 18 to 30), high (RS ≥31). TAILORx and RxPONDER refined treatment cutoffs (below).
  • Chemo for sure: RS ≥26 in pre- or postmenopausal regardless of N; or N1 in premenopausal regardless of RS.
  • No chemo: RS <26 + postmenopausal (N0 or 1 to 3 nodes), or RS <16 in premenopausal with pN0.
  • Consider chemo vs OFS + tamoxifen/AI: premenopausal, RS 16 to 25, pN0.
  • Give chemo for any N2 (≥4 nodes); do NOT use RS in N2. Oncotype is not used in DCIS.
  • TAILORx (N0): randomized RS 11 to 25; RS 0 to 10 endocrine alone, RS 26 to 100 assigned chemoendocrine. Endocrine alone for age >50 with RS ≤25; chemo benefit in age ≤50 with RS 16 to 25. RxPONDER (1 to 3 node+): postmenopausal RS 0 to 25 do NOT benefit from chemo; premenopausal RS 0 to 25 DO benefit (likely a chemo-induced ovarian suppression effect).
Oncotype DX recurrence score: treatment implicationsAll tumors HR+, HER2-
PopulationRSTreatment implication
PostmenopausalpN0 and pN1 (1 to 3 node+)<26pN0 (TAILORx) or pN1 (RxPONDER): no benefit from adjuvant chemo
≥26pN0 or pN1: add adjuvant chemo to endocrine tx
PremenopausalpN0<16No benefit from chemo (TAILORx)
16 to 25Small benefit (possibly ovarian suppression from chemo): consider chemo then endocrine, or OFS + tamoxifen/AI
≥26Add chemo to endocrine tx
PremenopausalpN1 (1 to 3 node+)<26premenopausal pN1 RS 0 to 25: chemo then endocrine (RxPONDER); OFS plus endocrine is not an established substitute for chemo (being tested in OFSET)
≥26Add adjuvant chemo to endocrine
Premenopausal N1 benefits from chemo regardless of RS.
Other signatures
  • Breast Cancer Index (BCI): predicts late recurrence and benefit from extended endocrine tx. Low BCI (0 to 5) in T1-2 N0 HR+ HER2-: low late recurrence, less benefit from extension beyond 5 yrs. High prognostic BCI: higher late recurrence. Benefit from extended endocrine therapy is predicted by BCI(H/I)-High, not by the prognostic score alone.
  • Prosigna (PAM50): intrinsic subtype + ROR score; FDA-approved for postmenopausal HR+ N0. EndoPredict also validated for late recurrence.

Continued in: Breast Cancer (Part 2): DCIS, Early-Stage and Metastatic Treatment

Veli Bakalov MD, Board Review Notes 2026