Study aid only. Verify against current guidelines before clinical use.

Trials · Malignant Hematology · Multiple Myeloma

ANDROMEDA

Kastritis E et al, NEJM, 2021; PMID: 33951368

Malignant HematologyMultiple MyelomaAmyloidosis2021
Background
ANDROMEDA was a phase III randomized open-label trial evaluating subcutaneous daratumumab (anti-CD38) plus bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCd) versus VCd alone in newly diagnosed immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell disorder in which amyloid fibril deposition causes progressive organ damage (heart, kidneys, liver, nerves); rapid and deep hematologic response is critical to prevent irreversible organ damage. VCd was the established standard of care; ANDROMEDA tested whether daratumumab augmentation could achieve deeper and faster responses to improve organ outcomes.
Interventions and follow up
Arm A (VCd): Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² + cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² + dexamethasone weekly × 6 cycles (28-day cycles)
Arm B (D-VCd): Subcutaneous daratumumab 1800 mg + VCd × 6 cycles → daratumumab maintenance (q4w × up to 2 years)
Primary endpoint: Hematologic complete response (hCR) at 6 months per IMWG criteria
Secondary: organ response, major organ deterioration/PFS, OS
mFollow-up: 20.3 months
Results
hCR: 53.3% vs 18.1% (OR 5.1, 95% CI 3.2–8.2, P<.001)
Overall hematologic response: 92.3% vs 76.9%
Cardiac organ response: 41.5% vs 22.2%
Renal organ response: 53.0% vs 23.9%
Survival free from major organ deterioration or death: HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.42–0.80, P<.001)
Adverse events
Overall: Grade ≥3 AEs 43.3% vs 35.9%
Infusion-related: reactions 7.3% (Grade ≥3: 0.5%, mitigated by SC formulation)
Neurologic: peripheral neuropathy Grade ≥3 5.2% vs 4.7%
Cardiac: AEs similar between arms; 2 cardiac deaths each arm in cardiac stage IIIb patients — daratumumab contraindicated in Mayo stage IIIb (NT-proBNP ≥8500 pg/mL)
Conclusions
Daratumumab SC added to VCd tripled the hematologic CR rate (53% vs 18%) and significantly improved cardiac and renal organ responses compared to VCd alone in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, establishing D-VCd as the standard of care for this organ-threatening plasma cell disorder.
Key Limitations
Open-label design; excluded Mayo Stage IIIb cardiac amyloidosis (highest-risk group — not eligible due to cardiac death safety signal in the daratumumab-amyloid experience); 6-month hCR as primary endpoint is a surrogate, though organ response and survival benefits are clinically meaningful; relatively short follow-up (20.3 months); SC daratumumab formulation (not IV) — ANDROMEDA was the pivotal trial for SC dara in AL amyloidosis; cyclophosphamide not universally used globally (some centers use melphalan-based combinations for transplant-ineligible); MRD assessments not incorporated into primary analyses.
Clinical Context
ANDROMEDA led to FDA approval of SC daratumumab (DARZALEX FASPRO) + VCd for AL amyloidosis in January 2021 — the first FDA approval specifically for AL amyloidosis. D-VCd is now preferred for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis in eligible patients (excluding Mayo IIIb) per ASCO/ESMO and expert consensus. AL amyloidosis has historically lacked randomized trial evidence; ANDROMEDA fundamentally changed treatment practice. The SC formulation reduced administration time (3–5 min vs 3+ hours for IV), improving tolerability in this fragile patient population. Importantly, dara should not be used in Mayo Stage IIIb amyloidosis based on safety data showing early excess cardiac deaths.
References
Kastritis E et al, NEJM, 2021; PMID: 33951368
Open in the interactive trials browser View source ↗