Background
Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial (BMT CTN 1501) of 127 patients with standard-risk acute GVHD (defined by Minnesota GVHD Risk Score and Ann Arbor biomarker status), testing whether sirolimus could replace prednisone as initial therapy and spare steroid exposure.
Interventions and follow up
Arm A: Sirolimus as initial therapy (n=58)
Arm B: Prednisone as initial therapy (n=64)
Primary endpoint: Day 28 complete response/partial response (CR/PR) rate
mFollow up: NR
Arm B: Prednisone as initial therapy (n=64)
Primary endpoint: Day 28 complete response/partial response (CR/PR) rate
mFollow up: NR
Results
Day 28 CR/PR: 64.8% (sirolimus) vs 73% (prednisone), similar
Day 28 CR/PR with prednisone ≤0.25 mg/kg/day: 66.7% vs 31.7%, P<.001 (favoring sirolimus)
Steroid-refractory aGVHD, DFS, relapse, NRM, OS: no significant differences detected
Day 28 CR/PR with prednisone ≤0.25 mg/kg/day: 66.7% vs 31.7%, P<.001 (favoring sirolimus)
Steroid-refractory aGVHD, DFS, relapse, NRM, OS: no significant differences detected
Adverse events
Sirolimus benefits: Reduced steroid exposure and hyperglycemia, fewer grade 2–3 infections, improved immunosuppression discontinuation, and better patient-reported quality of life
Sirolimus risk: Increased risk of thrombotic microangiopathy
Sirolimus risk: Increased risk of thrombotic microangiopathy
Conclusions
For clinical- and biomarker-defined standard-risk acute GVHD, sirolimus demonstrated similar initial treatment efficacy to prednisone while sparing steroid exposure and associated toxicity and improving quality of life, without compromising long-term survival.
Key Limitations
Modest sample size (N=127) powered as an estimation phase II study rather than a definitive superiority trial, and restricted to a biomarker-defined standard-risk population.
Clinical Context
BMT CTN 1501 supports a biomarker-guided, steroid-sparing strategy for standard-risk acute GVHD, where sirolimus can serve as an alternative to upfront high-dose prednisone in selected patients. It complements parallel efforts to risk-stratify aGVHD therapy by the Minnesota score and MAGIC/Ann Arbor biomarkers, and reflects the broader move toward de-escalating steroid exposure given its infectious and metabolic toxicity. Confirmatory phase III data are not yet available.