Study aid only. Verify against current guidelines, primary literature, staging manuals, and prescribing information before clinical use.

← All algorithms  ·  Related notes →

GEP Neuroendocrine Tumors: Systemic Therapy

First-line Second-line SECOND-LINE GEP neuroendocrine neoplasm Well-diff NET · SSTR+ Poorly-diff NEC Progressive after SSA Antiproliferative Somatostatin analog CLARINET ↗ PRRT 177Lu-DOTATATE NETTER-1 ↗ Small-cell-like Platinum + etoposide high-grade NEC mTOR Everolimus RADIANT-4 ↗ TKI (pNET) Sunitinib pancreatic NET ↗ Chemo (pNET) Capecitabine + temozolomide CAPTEM ↗

GEP Neuroendocrine Tumors: overview

This algorithm addresses systemic therapy for gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the first branch point is differentiation. For well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors that are somatostatin receptor positive (SSTR+), the first-line options are a somatostatin analog for antiproliferative control, supported by CLARINET, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE, supported by NETTER-1. Poorly differentiated, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma is treated as a small-cell-like disease with platinum plus etoposide.

For tumors that progress after a somatostatin analog, the second-line branch lists everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor (RADIANT-4), and two options shown specifically for pancreatic NET: the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib, and capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM). The chart therefore separates receptor-positive, well-differentiated disease, where SSTR-directed therapy comes first, from high-grade carcinoma, where platinum-based chemotherapy is the backbone.

Trials behind this algorithm

Background reading: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) board review notes.

GEP Neuroendocrine Tumors: the algorithm in words

Starting point: GEP neuroendocrine neoplasm. Full background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) notes.